The Supreme Court has rejected Verizon's attempt to reclaim a $47 million fine imposed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The fine was related to the company's practice of selling customer device-location data. Despite this legal setback, telecommunications carriers maintain that the sale of such data is not inherently illegal.
This decision comes amidst broader concerns about consumer privacy and data protection. In parallel, Amazon has updated its terms of service to mandate arbitration and class-action waivers for customer disputes, a move critics argue aims to prevent collective legal action. Separately, an emergency phone alert system has drawn criticism from campaigners who state it may have inadvertently endangered domestic abuse victims by revealing their locations.
Supreme Court Denies Verizon $47 Million FCC Fine Refund Bid
3 stories · 3 sources
#consumer #regulation #telemarketingOther digests
- 2026-10-13 — Medicaid Recipients Face Stricter Work Requirements Starting January 1
- 2026-10-12 — Cornell Lawsuit Highlights Global Pattern of Campus Sexual Violence
- 2026-10-11 — Roofing Scams and Debt Advice Pitfalls Highlight Consumer Protection Gaps
- 2026-10-10 — FDA Proposal to Exempt Toxic Food Chemicals Sparks Alarm
- 2026-10-09 — Ohio Blogger Fined for Sending Explicit Shrek Image to Senator; UK Probes WhatsApp Scam Calls
- 2026-10-08 — Residents Challenge 300% Service Charge Hike in Tribunal Victory
- 2026-10-07 — Australian Pharmacies Stock Abortion Pill After Relaxed Regulations
- 2026-10-06 — US Households Face Soaring Water Bills, Study Reveals
- 2026-10-03 — Lawmakers Demand Action on Convenience Store Overcharging After Guardian Investigation
- 2026-10-02 — Lyft Agrees to $272.5M Settlement in Driver Misclassification Case
- 2026-10-01 — Washington D.C. Landlords Prohibited from Banning Dog Breeds
- 2026-09-30 — Judge Permits Deportation of Mosque President Under Cold War-Era Law
- 2026-09-29 — Six Flags Permanently Closes X2 Rollercoaster Amid Injury Claims
- 2026-09-28 — Paramount, States Defend Antitrust Deal; Prediction Market Faces Gambling Law Scrutiny
- 2026-09-27 — Meta Faces $200 Billion Penalty After New Mexico Jury Finds Facebook Liable for Consumer Law Violations
- 2026-09-26 — New York Targets Polymarket with Lawsuit Over Unlicensed Gambling Operations
- 2026-09-25 — Florida Congressman Seeks Warrants for Flock Safety Camera Data Access
- 2026-09-24 — Massachusetts Probes Gambling Firms' AI Use Amidst Concerns
- 2026-09-23 — UK Watchdog Probes Pornhub for Potential Child Access Violations
- 2026-09-22 — DoorDash Fined $131.5M for Underpaying New York Delivery Workers
- 2026-09-21 — Ireland Fines Google €403 Million for Location Data Violations
- 2026-09-20 — Liberal Democrats Propose Big Tech Levy for Online Crime Agency
- 2026-09-19 — California Mandates Disclosure for Paid Political Influencer Content
- 2026-09-18 — SEC Proposes Rule Change to Curb Shareholder Activism
- 2026-09-17 — California AG Criticizes Paramount's Exit Threat; Michigan School Faces Backlash Over Menstrual Cycle Policy
- 2026-09-16 — EU Draft Law Seeks Social Media Ban for Under 13s
- 2026-09-15 — Water Firm Complaints Surge 84% Amidst Bill Hikes
- 2026-09-12 — ICE Officers Under Scrutiny for Baton Use on Protesters in Maryland
- 2026-09-11 — California Petition Worker Accused of Orchestrating Voter Signature Forgery Scheme
- 2026-09-10 — UK Hospitality Industry Warns Against Tourist Tax Amidst European Evidence of Minimal Impact