The U.S. military has taken action to disable advertising trackers on service members' phones and computers, a move prompted by concerns that foreign adversaries could exploit commercially available location data to identify and target American troops. This decision follows a report detailing how such data, often collected through apps, has been used in past incidents to pinpoint military personnel.
Senator Ron Wyden's office confirmed the military's response, highlighting the vulnerability of troop movements to exploitation. The military's directive aims to mitigate these risks by preventing the continuous collection and potential sale of location information associated with its personnel, thereby enhancing operational security and protecting service members from potential threats.
US Military Disables Ad Trackers on Troop Devices Amid Foreign Targeting Fears
16 stories · 6 sources
#surveillance #privacy #camerasOther digests
- 2026-10-17 — Canada's Proposed Surveillance Law Intensifies Global Threats to Encryption
- 2026-10-16 — Chicago Police Aided ICE in Spying on Anti-ICE Activists Despite Sanctuary Laws
- 2026-10-15 — Flock CEO Defends Surveillance Tech Amid Privacy Concerns and Misuse Allegations
- 2026-10-14 — Flock CEO Claims Microphones Detect Only Gunshots Amid Website Contradiction
- 2026-10-13 — Flock Cameras Under Scrutiny Amid Lawsuits and Allegations of Misuse
- 2026-10-12 — Microsoft Edge Feature Collects User Data, Company States Not for Spying
- 2026-10-11 — Employee Fired for Refusing Daily Webcam Surveillance, Fingerprints Emerge as New Tracking Method
- 2026-10-10 — Flock Safety Cuts Jobs Amid Growing Backlash Over Surveillance Technology
- 2026-10-09 — YouTuber Faces Police Inquiry After Building Flock-Style Camera to Monitor Law Enforcement
- 2026-10-08 — ICE Explores Using Palantir Tool for Voter Fraud Investigations
- 2026-10-07 — Norway Considers Smart Glasses Ban in Public Spaces Amid Privacy Fears
- 2026-10-06 — Australian Privacy Regulator Investigates Kmart Smartglasses App Maker
- 2026-10-05 — Texas City Demands $2 Million for Public Records on Flock Surveillance Camera Usage
- 2026-10-04 — Judge Rules Flock License Plate Searches Violate Fourth Amendment
- 2026-10-03 — Federal Judge Cites 'Indiscriminate Mass Surveillance' in Flock License Plate Case
- 2026-10-02 — Judge Rules Flock License Plate Searches Unconstitutional Mass Surveillance
- 2026-10-01 — Florida Officials Grapple with Unidentified Surveillance Cameras Amid Privacy Concerns
- 2026-09-30 — Border Phone Searches, USPS Truck Cameras Raise New Surveillance Alarms
- 2026-09-29 — Car Apps Transmit Extensive Data to Major Tech Firms, Study Finds
- 2026-09-28 — Dutchess County Removes Flock Cameras Following Security Breach and Wrongful Stop Incident
- 2026-09-27 — Flock Camera Vulnerability Exposes Over 335,000 Locations; Company Fights Researcher Map
- 2026-09-26 — Discord Implements New Age Verification Methods Based on User Activity
- 2026-09-25 — Flock Surveillance Under Fire Amidst Lawmaker Scrutiny and Officer Misconduct
- 2026-09-24 — Flock Relents, Requires Warrants for Police Database Searches
- 2026-09-23 — UK Watchdog Probes Pornhub Age Checks; Google Eyes Canadian User Data
- 2026-09-22 — Film's Depiction of Surveillance State Paranoia Aligns with Public Concerns Over New Cameras
- 2026-09-21 — Investigative Journalism Seeks Public Input on Local Police Surveillance Tactics
- 2026-09-20 — RNLI Warns Supporters of Data Breach Amid Far-Right Agitation
- 2026-09-19 — Dallas Garbage Trucks' AI Cameras Scan Homes, Issue Citations Amid Privacy Concerns
- 2026-09-18 — Flock Partners with Astroturfing Group Amidst Public Outcry Over Surveillance Cameras