Major ticket resale companies have filed a lawsuit against Washington D.C. challenging a new law that imposes a 10% cap on markups for ticket scalping. This legal challenge comes as federal authorities, including the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, have also taken action against a San Diego-based ticket broker. The federal complaint alleges the company engaged in a $120 million scheme, violating the Better Online Ticket Sales (BOTS) Act by using numerous accounts to acquire millions of tickets for resale at inflated prices, impacting popular artists like Beyoncé and Pitbull.
These developments highlight a growing regulatory focus on the practices within the ticket resale market, aiming to protect consumers from excessive pricing and unfair acquisition tactics. The lawsuit against D.C. suggests a broader industry pushback against legislative efforts to control secondary market pricing, while the federal action demonstrates ongoing enforcement against alleged illegal ticket brokering activities. Meanwhile, separate consumer protection concerns are emerging regarding access to public land ownership data, with the Land Registry paywall remaining in place despite promises of increased transparency.
Ticket Resellers Sue DC Over Markup Caps; Feds Target $120M Scheme
3 stories · 3 sources
#consumer #regulation #telemarketingOther digests
- 2026-10-16 — Ticket Resellers Sue DC Over Markup Caps; Feds Target $120M Scheme
- 2026-10-15 — Wayfair, Others Fined Millions for Deceptive Sales Tactics; Land Registry Data Access Delayed
- 2026-10-14 — Actor's PR Firm Tied to Smear Campaign Against Consumer Safety Advocate
- 2026-10-13 — Supreme Court to Hear Case on Targeted Advertising Lawsuits
- 2026-10-12 — Cornell Lawsuit Highlights Global Pattern of Campus Sexual Violence
- 2026-10-11 — Roofing Scams and Debt Advice Pitfalls Highlight Consumer Protection Gaps
- 2026-10-10 — FDA Proposal to Exempt Toxic Food Chemicals Sparks Alarm
- 2026-10-09 — Ohio Blogger Fined for Sending Explicit Shrek Image to Senator; UK Probes WhatsApp Scam Calls
- 2026-10-08 — Residents Challenge 300% Service Charge Hike in Tribunal Victory
- 2026-10-07 — Australian Pharmacies Stock Abortion Pill After Relaxed Regulations
- 2026-10-06 — US Households Face Soaring Water Bills, Study Reveals
- 2026-10-03 — Lawmakers Demand Action on Convenience Store Overcharging After Guardian Investigation
- 2026-10-02 — Lyft Agrees to $272.5M Settlement in Driver Misclassification Case
- 2026-10-01 — Washington D.C. Landlords Prohibited from Banning Dog Breeds
- 2026-09-30 — Judge Permits Deportation of Mosque President Under Cold War-Era Law
- 2026-09-29 — Six Flags Permanently Closes X2 Rollercoaster Amid Injury Claims
- 2026-09-28 — Paramount, States Defend Antitrust Deal; Prediction Market Faces Gambling Law Scrutiny
- 2026-09-27 — Meta Faces $200 Billion Penalty After New Mexico Jury Finds Facebook Liable for Consumer Law Violations
- 2026-09-26 — New York Targets Polymarket with Lawsuit Over Unlicensed Gambling Operations
- 2026-09-25 — Florida Congressman Seeks Warrants for Flock Safety Camera Data Access
- 2026-09-24 — Massachusetts Probes Gambling Firms' AI Use Amidst Concerns
- 2026-09-23 — UK Watchdog Probes Pornhub for Potential Child Access Violations
- 2026-09-22 — DoorDash Fined $131.5M for Underpaying New York Delivery Workers
- 2026-09-21 — Ireland Fines Google €403 Million for Location Data Violations
- 2026-09-20 — Liberal Democrats Propose Big Tech Levy for Online Crime Agency
- 2026-09-19 — California Mandates Disclosure for Paid Political Influencer Content
- 2026-09-18 — SEC Proposes Rule Change to Curb Shareholder Activism
- 2026-09-17 — California AG Criticizes Paramount's Exit Threat; Michigan School Faces Backlash Over Menstrual Cycle Policy
- 2026-09-16 — EU Draft Law Seeks Social Media Ban for Under 13s
- 2026-09-15 — Water Firm Complaints Surge 84% Amidst Bill Hikes